Point of View & Figurative Language — Practice · Grade 6 English
Chapter: Reading LiteratureWhat this practice covers
By the end of Point of View & Figurative Language you should be able to:
- I can identify first-person, third-person limited, and third-person omniscient point of view.
- I can identify similes, metaphors, personification, and hyperbole and explain their effect.
- I can distinguish a word's denotation from its connotation.
16 questions, multiple choice and written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: point of view, first-person point of view, third-person limited point of view, third-person omniscient point of view, figurative language, simile, metaphor, personification, hyperbole, denotation, connotation.
Problem 1
- First-person
- Third-person limited
- Third-person omniscient
- Second-person
Answer and explanation
First-person
The use of 'I' signals first-person point of view — the narrator is a character in the story.
Problem 2
- First-person
- Third-person limited
- Third-person omniscient
- There is no such narrator
Answer and explanation
Third-person omniscient
Only an all-knowing, third-person omniscient narrator can access multiple characters' inner thoughts.
Problem 3
- Simile
- Personification
- Hyperbole
- Literal statement
Answer and explanation
Personification
Dancing is a human action given to stars, which is personification.
Problem 4
- Her voice was fairly quiet.
- Her voice was like music.
- Her voice was music to my ears.
- Her voice sounded as sweet as honey.
Answer and explanation
Her voice was music to my ears.
This sentence directly states the voice IS music, with no 'like' or 'as,' making it a metaphor.
Problem 5
- They have different denotations but the same connotation
- They have the same basic denotation, but 'thrifty' has a positive connotation and 'cheap' a negative one
- 'Cheap' is a simile and 'thrifty' is a metaphor
- There is no difference at all
Answer and explanation
They have the same basic denotation, but 'thrifty' has a positive connotation and 'cheap' a negative one
Both point to the same literal meaning (not spending much), but 'thrifty' feels like praise while 'cheap' feels like criticism — that difference is connotation.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
Version A is first-person (it uses 'I') and is told by the person who took the seat, so it makes the action feel like a small, earned victory. Version B is third-person limited, centered on Deja's thoughts, so the same action feels inconsiderate and frustrating. It matters because the identical event means something completely different depending on whose point of view narrates it — point of view shapes the reader's sympathy.
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
(1) First-person point of view ('I,' 'my'). (2) Metaphor — 'my backpack a boulder' makes the pack feel crushingly heavy (with personification in 'the trail seemed to sneer'). (3) 'Sneer' denotes a scornful look but connotes cruel mockery, making the trail feel like a taunting rival.
(1) First-person point of view ('I,' 'my'). (2) Metaphor — 'my backpack a boulder' makes the pack feel crushingly heavy (with personification in 'the trail seemed to sneer'). (3) 'Sneer' denotes a scornful look but connotes cruel mockery, making the trail feel like a taunting rival.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
The first-person narrator reports seeing Ren stare, then admits an interpretation about anger. Ren’s explanation offers a different motive. The narrator cannot directly know all of Ren’s thoughts.
The first-person narrator reports seeing Ren stare, then admits an interpretation about anger. Ren’s explanation offers a different motive. The narrator cannot directly know all of Ren’s thoughts.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 9
Answer and explanation
The narrator can report the turn and a personal interpretation, but the action alone does not establish Ren’s private thought or a judgment about everyone. Attribute the inference and seek another detail or dialogue.
The narrator can report the turn and a personal interpretation, but the action alone does not establish Ren’s private thought or a judgment about everyone. Attribute the inference and seek another detail or dialogue.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 10
Answer and explanation
In the first case, (1) First-person point of view ('I,' 'my'). (2) Metaphor — 'my backpack a boulder' makes the pack feel crushingly heavy (with personification in 'the trail seemed to sneer'). (3) 'Sneer' denotes a scornful look but connotes cruel mockery, making the trail feel like a taunting rival. In the changed case, The first-person narrator reports seeing Ren stare, then admits an interpretation about anger. Ren’s explanation offers a different motive. The narrator cannot directly know all of Ren’s thoughts. The method of defining the relationship and testing relevant evidence transfers; the particular source detail and scope must be checked anew.
In the first case, (1) First-person point of view ('I,' 'my'). (2) Metaphor — 'my backpack a boulder' makes the pack feel crushingly heavy (with personification in 'the trail seemed to sneer'). (3) 'Sneer' denotes a scornful look but connotes cruel mockery, making the trail feel like a taunting rival. In the changed case, The first-person narrator reports seeing Ren stare, then admits an interpretation about anger. Ren’s explanation offers a different motive. The narrator cannot directly know all of Ren’s thoughts. The method of defining the relationship and testing relevant evidence transfers; the particular source detail and scope must be checked anew.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 11
Answer and explanation
(1) First-person point of view ('I,' 'my'). (2) Metaphor — 'my backpack a boulder' makes the pack feel crushingly heavy (with personification in 'the trail seemed to sneer'). (3) 'Sneer' denotes a scornful look but connotes cruel mockery, making the trail feel like a taunting rival.
(1) First-person point of view ('I,' 'my'). (2) Metaphor — 'my backpack a boulder' makes the pack feel crushingly heavy (with personification in 'the trail seemed to sneer'). (3) 'Sneer' denotes a scornful look but connotes cruel mockery, making the trail feel like a taunting rival.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 12
Answer and explanation
(1) First-person point of view ('I,' 'my'). (2) Metaphor — 'my backpack a boulder' makes the pack feel crushingly heavy (with personification in 'the trail seemed to sneer'). (3) 'Sneer' denotes a scornful look but connotes cruel mockery, making the trail feel like a taunting rival. Keep the conclusion limited to the given scene or source. A competing interpretation must explain rather than ignore the detail that supports the first reading.
(1) First-person point of view ('I,' 'my'). (2) Metaphor — 'my backpack a boulder' makes the pack feel crushingly heavy (with personification in 'the trail seemed to sneer'). (3) 'Sneer' denotes a scornful look but connotes cruel mockery, making the trail feel like a taunting rival. Keep the conclusion limited to the given scene or source. A competing interpretation must explain rather than ignore the detail that supports the first reading.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 13
Answer and explanation
(1) First-person point of view ('I,' 'my'). (2) Metaphor — 'my backpack a boulder' makes the pack feel crushingly heavy (with personification in 'the trail seemed to sneer'). (3) 'Sneer' denotes a scornful look but connotes cruel mockery, making the trail feel like a taunting rival. Name the relevant detail before explaining its connection. A conclusion alone does not demonstrate the method.
(1) First-person point of view ('I,' 'my'). (2) Metaphor — 'my backpack a boulder' makes the pack feel crushingly heavy (with personification in 'the trail seemed to sneer'). (3) 'Sneer' denotes a scornful look but connotes cruel mockery, making the trail feel like a taunting rival. Name the relevant detail before explaining its connection. A conclusion alone does not demonstrate the method.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 14
Answer and explanation
(1) First-person point of view ('I,' 'my'). (2) Metaphor — 'my backpack a boulder' makes the pack feel crushingly heavy (with personification in 'the trail seemed to sneer'). (3) 'Sneer' denotes a scornful look but connotes cruel mockery, making the trail feel like a taunting rival. The new paragraph must name its own source detail and explain how the same method fits it; this model is not a substitute for reading.
(1) First-person point of view ('I,' 'my'). (2) Metaphor — 'my backpack a boulder' makes the pack feel crushingly heavy (with personification in 'the trail seemed to sneer'). (3) 'Sneer' denotes a scornful look but connotes cruel mockery, making the trail feel like a taunting rival. The new paragraph must name its own source detail and explain how the same method fits it; this model is not a substitute for reading.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 15
Answer and explanation
(1) First-person point of view ('I,' 'my'). (2) Metaphor — 'my backpack a boulder' makes the pack feel crushingly heavy (with personification in 'the trail seemed to sneer'). (3) 'Sneer' denotes a scornful look but connotes cruel mockery, making the trail feel like a taunting rival. Replace an unsupported always/proves claim with the scope the record supports. A language revision must preserve intended meaning.
(1) First-person point of view ('I,' 'my'). (2) Metaphor — 'my backpack a boulder' makes the pack feel crushingly heavy (with personification in 'the trail seemed to sneer'). (3) 'Sneer' denotes a scornful look but connotes cruel mockery, making the trail feel like a taunting rival. Replace an unsupported always/proves claim with the scope the record supports. A language revision must preserve intended meaning.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 16
Answer and explanation
First make a literal account: who acts, what changes and who tells it. An inference goes beyond an explicit statement but must be supported by a specific action or phrase. A narrator’s opinion is evidence about that voice; it is not automatically the author’s opinion or an objective fact about a group. Use an example from the supplied case and explain the limit in ordinary language.
First make a literal account: who acts, what changes and who tells it. An inference goes beyond an explicit statement but must be supported by a specific action or phrase. A narrator’s opinion is evidence about that voice; it is not automatically the author’s opinion or an objective fact about a group. Use an example from the supplied case and explain the limit in ordinary language.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.