Radical Functions & Equations
Squaring both sides is legal, and it can still hand you an answer that is wrong.
Solve √x = -3.
Square both sides. Squaring is something you are allowed to do to an equation, so nothing improper has happened.
You get x = 9. Now put it back: √9 = 3, and 3 is not -3.
Every step was legal, and the answer is still wrong. Something about squaring loses information.
Squaring forgets the sign it started with — 3 and -3 both square to 9. So a radical equation is not finished until every answer has been put back and checked.
The shape of a root graph
y = √x starts at the origin and climbs, but more and more slowly — it is half a parabola on its side.
It exists only for x ≥ 0, because a square root of a negative is not a real number.
y = √[3]x has no such limit. It accepts negatives and runs through all four quadrants.
Where a root graph starts
For y = √x - 4, the inside must be ≥ 0, so the graph begins at x = 4. Set the inside to zero and you have the starting point.
Isolate the root first
Get the radical alone on one side before squaring. Squaring a sum squares the cross terms too, and creates work you did not need.
√x+1 + 2 = 6 should become √x+1 = 4 before anything else happens.
Then square once, cleanly, and solve what is left.
Square the sides, not the terms
(√x + 2)2 is x + 4√x + 4, not x + 4. Squaring does not distribute over addition, which is exactly why you isolate first.
Always check
Squaring can create solutions that were never there, so the last step of every radical equation is to put the answers back.
This is not neatness — it is part of the method. An unchecked answer is an unfinished problem.
If a value fails, say so and discard it. Sometimes every candidate fails, and the honest answer is "no solution".
A one-line filter
A square root can never equal a negative number. If the isolated equation reads √… = -5, you can stop right there.
Rational exponents say the same thing
x1/2 means √x, and x2/3 means √[3]x2. The denominator is the root, the numerator is the power.
Writing roots as exponents lets you use the exponent rules instead of learning separate radical rules.
√x · √[3]x is awkward; x1/2 · x1/3 = x5/6 is not.
Bottom is the root
82/3: cube root first to get 2, then square to get 4. Taking the root first keeps the numbers small.
Two radicals
When two roots appear, isolate one, square, and see what survives. Usually one radical is left.
Isolate that one and square again. Two squarings are normal and nothing has gone wrong.
Checking matters even more here, because each squaring is another chance to invent a solution.
Expect it to get worse before better
After the first squaring the equation often looks messier. That is the method working, not a sign you took a wrong turn.
Worked examples
A straightforward one
Solve √2x + 3 = 5.
- The radical is already alone, so square both sides: 2x + 3 = 25. Squaring undoes the root.
- Solve: 2x = 22, so x = 11. Ordinary linear algebra from here.
- Check: √2(11)+3 = √25 = 5. It works. The check is part of the method, not an optional extra.
x = 11
One that lies to you
Solve √x + 6 = x.
- Square: x + 6 = x2, so x2 - x - 6 = 0. A quadratic appears — that is normal.
- Factor: (x-3)(x+2) = 0, giving x = 3 or x = -2. Two candidates, not yet two answers.
- Check x=3: √9 = 3, good. Check x=-2: √4 = 2 ≠ -2, so discard it. The root is positive; it can never equal -2.
x = 3 only
A rational exponent
Evaluate 163/4 without a calculator.
- The denominator 4 is the root: √[4]16 = 2. Take the root first to keep the numbers small.
- The numerator 3 is the power: 23 = 8. Power second.
- So 163/4 = 8. Doing it the other way needs 163 = 4096 first — same answer, much more work.
8
Words to know
- Radical equation
- An equation with the unknown underneath a root sign.
- Extraneous solution
- A value the algebra produces that fails in the original equation.
- Principal root
- The non-negative one. √25 = 5, never -5.
- Index
- The little number on the root. Square root has index 2, cube root index 3.
- Domain restriction
- A square root needs its inside to be ≥ 0, which limits the inputs allowed.
Mistakes to watch for
Skipping the check. Solving √x+6 = x gives x = 3 and x = -2, but -2 fails because a square root is never negative. Squaring can invent solutions, so the check is part of the method.
Squaring term by term. (√x + 2)2 is x + 4√x + 4, not x + 4. Squaring does not distribute over addition, which is why the radical is isolated first.
Reading x2/3 as 23x. The fraction is an exponent: the bottom is the root and the top is the power, so 82/3 = 4, not 163.
Ignoring the domain of the graph. y = √x-4 does not exist to the left of 4, so plotting points at x = 0 or x = 2 produces a curve that is not there.
Giving up after one squaring when two radicals are present. One squaring usually leaves a single radical behind. Isolate it and square again — the mess in the middle is expected.
Answers like this have a name: extraneous solutions. They are not mistakes in your working — they are created by a legal step that is not reversible.
The square root sign means the positive root only. Without that convention √9 would be two numbers, and √x would not be a function at all.
Cube roots have no such trouble. √[3]-8 = -2 is perfectly happy, because cubing keeps the sign.