Climate Data, Trends & Attribution — Practice · Grade 12 Science
Chapter: Pollution, Carbon & Climate EvidenceWhat this practice covers
By the end of Climate Data, Trends & Attribution you should be able to:
- I can interpret anomalies, baselines, and interval trends.
- I can distinguish observations, scenarios, and evidence for attribution.
8 questions, numeric and written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: anomaly, attribution, scenario.
Problem 1
Hints
Write the relationship first; substitute with consistent units.
Answer and explanation
0.2 °C/decade
.6/30×10=.2.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
Its spatial and temporal scope is narrower than the long-term global statistical question.
Response criteria
- State a scientifically accurate conclusion.
- Show the calculation or mechanism that supports it.
- Include units, conditions, or limits where relevant.
Problem 3
Hints
List the given quantities, select a relationship, and check units before substituting.
Answer and explanation
0.2 °C/decade
.8/40×10=.2.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
Projections depend on future scenarios and models; observations describe measured past/current conditions.
Response criteria
- State a scientifically accurate conclusion.
- Show the calculation or mechanism that supports it.
- Include units, conditions, or limits where relevant.
Problem 5
Hints
Data coverage, baseline and uncertainty affect interpretation.
Answer and explanation
0.15×3=0.45°C.
Problem 6
Hints
State what the supplied observations or conditions establish, and separate that from any assumption.
Answer and explanation
They compare deviations relative to a reference, reducing effects of different absolute local temperatures; the baseline must be clear.
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
No. It measures a different aspect of the energy system and provides complementary evidence with its own coverage and uncertainty.
A global estimate combines observations with stated spatial coverage and analysis methods. Coverage bias can arise when sampled places differ systematically from missing places; measurement changes and calibration also require assessment. Independent datasets and indicators help test whether an apparent trend is an artifact of one method, although they need not measure exactly the same physical quantity. Do not invent a station-level error bar from the annual global values alone; use the source’s uncertainty methods.
No. It measures a different aspect of the energy system and provides complementary evidence with its own coverage and uncertainty.
Response criteria
- Interpret labels, structures, axes, units and directions correctly.
- Explain the physical or environmental relationship or mechanism.
- Respect stated assumptions and distinguish observation from inference.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
Original anomalies are 0.6 and 1.0°C; new anomalies 0.4 and 0.8°C. The difference remains 0.4°C, so a uniform baseline shift changes offset rather than physical change.
Original anomalies are 0.6 and 1.0°C; new anomalies 0.4 and 0.8°C.
The difference remains 0.4°C, so a uniform baseline shift changes offset rather than physical change.
Response criteria
- Use the stated measurements or conditions, with correct units.
- Connect the result to the physical or environmental mechanism or evidence relationship.
- Identify the assumption, model limit or further evidence requested.