Climate Evidence, Trends & Projections — Print · Grade 9 Science

Chapter: Oceans, Carbon & Climate

Climate Evidence, Trends & Projections

Learning goals

Readings for this unit

Before this unit

Read trends, anomalies and sampling intervals.

Plan three teaching sessions: core explanation and Parts 1–2; Parts 3–4 with diagrams and reasoning checks; then the whole-unit application, worked examples, independent practice, and exit check. Read one part at a time, explain it without notes, and revisit any gap. Allow about 40–50 minutes per session; adjust after checking understanding. Trace and explain the labeled figures in each part. In the third session, complete the illustrated case and changed independent application; retain a corrected explanation rather than only an answer.

Start with something to explain

How can we tell an observed climate record from a conditional future curve?

Actual record and illustrative comparison. NASA’s selected 1970–2024 annual global-anomaly record uses a 1951–1980 baseline. Separate toy future curves depend on scenario assumptions.

A temperature anomaly needs a specified referenceA temperature anomaly needs a specified referenceIllustrative temperature (°C)Site cold season12Matched baseline15Observed comparison18Anomaly = observation − matched reference; here 18 − 15 = +3 °C.
Original illustrative baseline comparison, not NASA’s global observed series. The cold-season value is included to expose an unmatched comparison. Temperature, anomaly and reference interval must be named separately.

Notice and wonder

Record two observations using the stated quantities or relationships. Keep observations separate from possible causes. Write one question that a new measurement could help answer.

How can we tell an observed climate record from a conditional future curve?

Your first model

Label observation, inferred proxy and projection separately, with their reference and interval.

Build the language from the idea

anomaly
A difference from a defined reference value.
projection
A conditional estimate based on stated future assumptions.
baseline
The reference period or value used for comparison.

An anomaly is a difference from a reference value, not the total temperature. A location with a +1°C anomaly is one degree warmer than its baseline for the same measure and period. Compare datasets only after checking units, time intervals, geographic coverage, and reference periods.

A temperature anomaly needs a specified referenceA temperature anomaly needs a specified referenceIllustrative temperature (°C)Site cold season12Matched baseline15Observed comparison18Anomaly = observation − matched reference; here 18 − 15 = +3 °C.
Original illustrative baseline comparison, not NASA’s global observed series. The cold-season value is included to expose an unmatched comparison. Temperature, anomaly and reference interval must be named separately.

Climate describes distributions and patterns over many years. Individual hot or cold events occur within these patterns. Evidence from surface measurements, ocean heat, ice, and other records can be compared. A trend in two quantities is not by itself a complete causal explanation; mechanisms and independent evidence strengthen the analysis.

Read an actual global temperature-analysis recordRead an actual global temperature-analysis recordGlobal annual anomaly (°C; 1951–1980 baseline)-0.200.40.81.21970198019902000201020202025YearNASA GISS/GISTEMP v4 • complete selected annual entries 1970–2024
Original plot of actual NASA GISTEMP v4 annual global Land–Ocean estimates, all 55 selected years from 1970–2024. Anomalies in °C relative to 1951–1980; record accessed 2026-10-13. Citation: GISTEMP Team (2026) and Lenssen et al. (2024). Later years are outside this selected interval, and the graph alone does not establish causal attribution. NASA GISS/GISTEMP v4 — source and analysis · Lenssen et al. (2024) — observational uncertainty

A climate projection asks what may happen under specified assumptions, such as an emissions pathway. It is conditional rather than an exact prediction of a particular day’s weather. Ranges can reflect measurement uncertainty, natural variability, model differences, and choices about future human activity. Uncertainty does not mean that all outcomes are equally likely.

A future curve is conditional on a scenarioA future curve is conditional on a scenarioIllustrative projected anomaly (°C)00.40.81.21.60102030Years after the model referenceScenario AScenario B
Original invented conditional projection curves for reading scenarios. They are explicitly separate from the NASA observed record and do not correspond to official emissions pathways, model ensembles or probability bands. All comparisons use the same supplied reference and interval.

An anomaly is a difference from a stated reference average. Changing the reference can shift plotted values without changing the underlying trend. Always read the baseline, region, time interval and units of a climate graph.

Instrument records and proxies answer different questions. Ice cores, tree rings and sediments require calibration and have different time resolution. Agreement among independent records strengthens an interpretation, while mismatches should be investigated rather than hidden.

A projection uses a model and specified assumptions about future forcing. Distinguish uncertainty in measurements, natural variability, model behavior and future human choices. Report a range and scenario rather than pretending one projected number is guaranteed.

Build your understanding

Plan three teaching sessions: core explanation and Parts 1–2; Parts 3–4 with diagrams and reasoning checks; then the whole-unit application, worked examples, independent practice, and exit check. Read one part at a time, explain it without notes, and revisit any gap. Allow about 40–50 minutes per session; adjust after checking understanding.

Part 1 · Design a comparable time-series question

An anomaly is the difference between a measured or estimated value and a specified reference. Here an observed 18 °C compared with a matched 15 °C baseline gives +3 °C. The reference must match the variable, region and seasonal/monthly definition. A cold-season 12 °C value is not interchangeable with the annual baseline without context. Changing the baseline can shift plotted anomaly values even when the underlying temperature history is unchanged. Record baseline, coverage and interval alongside the graph rather than interpreting the zero line as an absence of temperature.

A temperature anomaly needs a specified referenceA temperature anomaly needs a specified referenceIllustrative temperature (°C)Site cold season12Matched baseline15Observed comparison18Anomaly = observation − matched reference; here 18 − 15 = +3 °C.
Original illustrative baseline comparison, not NASA’s global observed series. The cold-season value is included to expose an unmatched comparison. Temperature, anomaly and reference interval must be named separately.

Read the visual model

Subtract the matched 15 °C reference, not the different-season bar. Zero anomaly means equality with the chosen reference.

If the same 18 °C observation were compared with a valid 16 °C reference, what anomaly would result?

Visual reasoning — after your attempt

+2 °C. A baseline change shifts the anomaly; it does not itself change the observed 18 °C value.

State the variable, region, interval and baseline before examining a trend. An anomaly is a difference from a reference average, not an absolute temperature. Coverage and measurement changes can affect comparisons. Records need documented methods so a trend is evaluated consistently rather than assembled from incompatible numbers.

An anomaly of +1 °C means one degree above the chosen baseline. It does not mean the location’s actual temperature is 1 °C, nor that every place shares the same anomaly.

Pause and explain

What information is missing from a temperature anomaly without a baseline?

Check your reasoning after answering

The reference period and definition needed to interpret the difference.

Part 2 · Understand proxy evidence and calibration

A proxy is an indirect indicator of a condition, such as isotope ratios in ice, assemblages in sediment or tree-ring properties. The measurement becomes an inferred temperature, moisture or other variable through an explained and calibrated relationship. Growth can respond to several factors, and archives can have dating uncertainty or missing sections. Comparing different proxies can strengthen a reconstruction while revealing limits. A ring-width series is not a thermometer reading, and an ice-core gas measurement and isotope temperature proxy record different aspects of the system. State what each archive measures before drawing a combined conclusion.

A proxy is a measured indicator requiring interpretationA proxy is a measured indicator requiring interpretationDifferent archives preserve different measured quantitiesIce layersSediment layersTree ringsProxy → calibration → inferred condition, with uncertainty.
Original qualitative archive models separate ice, sediment and tree rings. They do not reproduce actual sampled cores or dendrochronological data. The figure introduces the nature and limits of proxy interpretation rather than supplying a historical climate curve.

Read the visual model

The panels are archive structures, not actual proxy values. The arrow chain in the text explains the step from observation to interpretation.

Why should wider tree rings not automatically be labeled warmer years in every setting?

Visual reasoning — after your attempt

Growth may depend on moisture, temperature, nutrients and other conditions. A location-specific calibrated relationship and uncertainty are needed to infer a particular variable.

Tree rings, ice, sediments and other archives can preserve indicators related to past conditions. A proxy is interpreted through a relation, calibration and uncertainty; it is not a direct thermometer reading of all past weather. Different proxies sample different regions, seasons and processes.

A tree-ring pattern influenced by both moisture and temperature needs those influences considered. Compare several records and a calibrated relationship before attributing the entire signal to one climate variable.

Pause and explain

Why can one proxy reflect more than temperature?

Check your reasoning after answering

Growth or chemistry can respond to several environmental conditions; calibration and comparison are needed.

Part 3 · Separate trend, noise and explanation

This graph uses NASA GISTEMP v4 annual Land–Ocean Temperature Index values for every year from 1970 through 2024 in the downloaded snapshot. The anomaly is relative to the 1951–1980 mean, not to a preindustrial baseline. The series is an observational analysis combining meteorological station and ocean records; it is not a direct thermometer placed at one global location. Individual annual changes occur within the broader record. A selected short interval can show a decline while the full interval rises, so state both endpoints and check the complete chosen record rather than choosing a segment to imply every year changed identically.

Read an actual global temperature-analysis recordRead an actual global temperature-analysis recordGlobal annual anomaly (°C; 1951–1980 baseline)-0.200.40.81.21970198019902000201020202025YearNASA GISS/GISTEMP v4 • complete selected annual entries 1970–2024
Original plot of actual NASA GISTEMP v4 annual global Land–Ocean estimates, all 55 selected years from 1970–2024. Anomalies in °C relative to 1951–1980; record accessed 2026-10-13. Citation: GISTEMP Team (2026) and Lenssen et al. (2024). Later years are outside this selected interval, and the graph alone does not establish causal attribution. NASA GISS/GISTEMP v4 — source and analysis · Lenssen et al. (2024) — observational uncertainty

Read the visual model

Read the actual annual points and their stated baseline. The plot’s upper values are anomalies, not Earth’s absolute surface temperature.

What does the 2024 value 1.28 °C mean, and does this graph say every place was exactly 1.28 °C warmer?

Visual reasoning — after your attempt

It is the estimated global annual Land–Ocean anomaly of +1.28 °C relative to the 1951–1980 baseline in this accessed record. Regional and daily changes vary; it is not the same increase everywhere.

A trend concerns a sustained pattern; variability creates departures around it. Choose an interval appropriate to the question and examine the effect of endpoints. A statistical association suggests a relation but attribution requires mechanisms and other evidence. Report uncertainty without pretending it means every explanation is equally supported.

Starting a graph at an unusual peak can change a short trend estimate. Compare the longer record and ask whether the selected start date was chosen before or after seeing the desired result.

Every selected annual value — NASA GISTEMP snapshot

Every selected annual value — NASA GISTEMP snapshot

All complete annual entries from 1970 through 2024, accessed 2026-10-13. These are historical observational-analysis estimates, not invented values or future projections. NASA may revise earlier estimates when new reports/corrections arrive.

YearAnnual anomaly (°C; 1951–1980 baseline)
19700.03
1971-0.08
19720.01
19730.16
1974-0.07
1975-0.01
1976-0.1
19770.18
19780.07
19790.16
19800.26
19810.32
19820.14
19830.31
19840.16
19850.12
19860.18
19870.32
19880.39
19890.27
19900.45
19910.41
19920.22
19930.23
19940.31
19950.45
19960.33
19970.47
19980.61
19990.38
20000.39
20010.53
20020.63
20030.62
20040.53
20050.68
20060.64
20070.66
20080.54
20090.66
20100.72
20110.61
20120.65
20130.67
20140.75
20150.89
20161.01
20170.91
20180.85
20190.98
20201.01
20210.85
20220.89
20231.17
20241.28

Pause and explain

Why can a short endpoint-selected interval misrepresent a longer pattern?

Check your reasoning after answering

Temporary variability and unusual endpoints can dominate the chosen slope.

Part 4 · Read projections as conditional results

A projection is a modeled outcome under specified assumptions about future inputs and processes. Scenario A and B here are deliberately invented trajectories for practicing interpretation, separate from the observed NASA historical plot. Comparing them requires the same baseline, variable, region and time definition. An ensemble range can reflect different models, inputs or initial conditions; it is not automatically a calibrated probability range, and shared assumptions can leave systematic limitations. State what a curve and any shading represent before saying the future will be exactly one value.

A future curve is conditional on a scenarioA future curve is conditional on a scenarioIllustrative projected anomaly (°C)00.40.81.21.60102030Years after the model referenceScenario AScenario B
Original invented conditional projection curves for reading scenarios. They are explicitly separate from the NASA observed record and do not correspond to official emissions pathways, model ensembles or probability bands. All comparisons use the same supplied reference and interval.

Read the visual model

Compare scenarios at the same future interval while keeping their common reference. Do not splice either invented curve onto the observed NASA record as if it had already occurred.

At year 30, what is the difference between the two supplied projected anomalies, and what would be required to treat them as actual forecasts?

Visual reasoning — after your attempt

1.4−0.7 = 0.7 °C. Defined scenarios, process models, validation, uncertainty and the variable/region/reference would be needed; these illustrative curves alone are not operational forecasts.

Models represent processes and are tested against evidence. A projection describes outcomes under specified assumptions or scenarios; a prediction about actual future decisions is a separate claim. Ensembles can indicate ranges, while shared assumptions can leave systematic limitations. Identify what a graph’s range actually represents.

Two projections with different emissions assumptions can both be valid conditional calculations. Their difference does not automatically prove that one model is broken; compare inputs and definitions.

Pause and explain

What must be checked before comparing two projection curves?

Check your reasoning after answering

Scenarios, baseline, model definitions, region, interval and what the uncertainty range represents.

Apply the whole unit · A trend with variability

Illustrative decadal anomalies relative to one fixed baseline: −0.2, +0.1, 0.0, +0.4, +0.7 °C.

Your task

Plot the series, describe trend and variation, compare first-to-last change, and explain why these five values neither establish a cause alone nor describe every local day.

What your response should show

  • Use the supplied evidence accurately and label units or locations.
  • Explain a physical mechanism or evidence-to-claim relationship.
  • Show calculations or a clearly labeled model when the task calls for one.
  • Identify a meaningful assumption, uncertainty, or competing explanation.
Response guidance — after your attempt

First-to-last change is +0.9 °C and the overall pattern rises with a temporary decline. Causal attribution needs mechanisms and independent evidence; decadal averages omit short-term and local variation. Keep the baseline fixed.

Scientific references and adapted source material

Parent / teacher teaching notes

Have the learner read axes and baseline before interpreting. Ask for a supported trend and an unsupported causal claim; reteach with a changed endpoint and discuss the difference. Ask the learner to explain each visual label and causal step before calculating. Preserve a first model, attempt the changed independent case, then use feedback to revise. Diagrams state whether values are illustrative or observed. Selected OpenSciEd excerpts are middle-school source material used for supported foundations; the independent high-school explanations and supplements are not the complete OpenSciEd teacher editions or an endorsement.

The key idea

Interpret climate data with their baseline and scale, and read projections together with their assumptions.

Worked examples

Example 1

A measured mean is 15.2°C and its baseline mean is 14.5°C. Calculate the anomaly.
  1. Anomaly = measured mean − baseline mean.
  2. 15.2 − 14.5 = 0.7.
Answer: +0.7°C

Example 2 · Worked application

A record has annual anomalies 0.1, 0.4, 0.2, 0.6 and 0.7°C. Interpret trend and variation.
  1. Individual years fluctuate, including a drop from year 2 to 3.
  2. The endpoint change is +0.6°C over four intervals, but five years is too short for robust climate attribution.
Answer: The short record rises overall with variation; it alone does not establish a long-term climate trend or cause.
Check the reasoning

Distinguish endpoint change from a fitted trend and attribution.

Example 3

An annual temperature is 14°C; baseline A is 12°C and B is 13°C. Find both anomalies.
  1. Subtract each reference from the measurement.
  2. 14−12=+2°C; 14−13=+1°C.
Answer: +2°C relative to A and +1°C relative to B; the actual temperature is unchanged.

Example 4 · Find and fix the mistake

Context: A record has annual anomalies 0.1, 0.4, 0.2, 0.6 and 0.7°C. Interpret trend and variation. A student claims: “One cooler year disproves a longer warming trend.” Evaluate the claim and write a corrected explanation.
  1. Test the claim against the stated conditions: Distinguish endpoint change from a fitted trend and attribution.
  2. Year-to-year variation can occur within a longer-term trend.
Answer: Year-to-year variation can occur within a longer-term trend.
Check the reasoning

Distinguish endpoint change from a fitted trend and attribution.

Example 5 · Reason from the visual evidence

Read an actual global temperature-analysis recordRead an actual global temperature-analysis recordGlobal annual anomaly (°C; 1951–1980 baseline)-0.200.40.81.21970198019902000201020202025YearNASA GISS/GISTEMP v4 • complete selected annual entries 1970–2024
Original plot of actual NASA GISTEMP v4 annual global Land–Ocean estimates, all 55 selected years from 1970–2024. Anomalies in °C relative to 1951–1980; record accessed 2026-10-13. Citation: GISTEMP Team (2026) and Lenssen et al. (2024). Later years are outside this selected interval, and the graph alone does not establish causal attribution. NASA GISS/GISTEMP v4 — source and analysis · Lenssen et al. (2024) — observational uncertainty
What does the 2024 value 1.28 °C mean, and does this graph say every place was exactly 1.28 °C warmer?
  1. Read the actual annual points and their stated baseline. The plot’s upper values are anomalies, not Earth’s absolute surface temperature.
  2. It is the estimated global annual Land–Ocean anomaly of +1.28 °C relative to the 1951–1980 baseline in this accessed record. Regional and daily changes vary; it is not the same increase everywhere.
Answer: It is the estimated global annual Land–Ocean anomaly of +1.28 °C relative to the 1951–1980 baseline in this accessed record. Regional and daily changes vary; it is not the same increase everywhere.
Check the reasoning

Original plot of actual NASA GISTEMP v4 annual global Land–Ocean estimates, all 55 selected years from 1970–2024. Anomalies in °C relative to 1951–1980; record accessed 2026-10-13. Citation: GISTEMP Team (2026) and Lenssen et al. (2024). Later years are outside this selected interval, and the graph alone does not establish causal attribution.

Avoid these mistakes

Check your understanding

An annual temperature is 14°C; baseline A is 12°C and B is 13°C. Find both anomalies.

Discuss the answer

+2°C relative to A and +1°C relative to B; the actual temperature is unchanged.

Why does a projection need its scenario stated alongside its result?

Discuss the answer

A projection is conditional on inputs and model assumptions. State the scenario, baseline, coverage and interval to identify what the curve represents and compare it fairly with alternatives or observations.

Return to the phenomenon

Return to the initial case. How can we tell an observed climate record from a conditional future curve? Revise your drawing or explanation using two named ideas and one stated limitation.

Compare explanations after your attempt

The NASA curve is an observational analysis with annual variability; proxies require calibration and projections depend on scenarios. Fair comparisons preserve variable, region, baseline and time definitions, while a graph alone is not complete causal attribution.

What should we investigate next?

Which comparison would test a remaining uncertainty? State what you would change, keep comparable and measure.

Investigate, explain and revise

Complete the tasks after studying the visual parts. Keep the first model and explain a revision before consulting the guidance.

Activity 1 · Explain the opening case

Assigned reading and preparation

Use this unit’s opening record, Parts 1–4 and your notebook model. No external equipment or text is required for this supplied-data route.

Your task

Return to the initial case. How can we tell an observed climate record from a conditional future curve? Revise your drawing or explanation using two named ideas and one stated limitation.

Success criteria

  • Use two stated observations or conditions.
  • Connect the mechanism to a labeled diagram or calculation.
  • Identify what your original model missed.
  • State a useful further test and a limitation.
Hint

Name the quantities and interactions before assigning a cause.

Response guidance — discuss after your attempt

The NASA curve is an observational analysis with annual variability; proxies require calibration and projections depend on scenarios. Fair comparisons preserve variable, region, baseline and time definitions, while a graph alone is not complete causal attribution.

Activity 2 · Transfer to a changed case

Assigned reading and preparation

Use the figures, captions and vocabulary in this unit; cover the worked answer.

Your task

An observed annual temperature is 16.4 °C and its matched baseline is 15.8 °C. Find the anomaly. A separate future scenario curve gives +1.2 °C at year 20. Explain what must be supplied before comparing the values.

Success criteria

  • Use the stated measurements or conditions, with correct units.
  • Connect the result to the physical mechanism or evidence relationship.
  • Identify the assumption, model limit or further evidence requested.
Hint

Separate measured values, calculated results and model assumptions.

Response guidance — discuss after your attempt

The observed anomaly is +0.6 °C. The projection must specify the same variable, region, baseline and averaging interval, plus its scenario/assumptions. An observation and a conditional future model remain different kinds of evidence.

Words to know

anomaly
A difference from a defined reference value.
projection
A conditional estimate based on stated future assumptions.
baseline
The reference period or value used for comparison.

In the real world

Exit check

How would you strengthen a claim about climate change beyond one short graph?

Check your explanation after answering

Use longer records, independent measurements, clear baselines, uncertainty estimates, and mechanisms consistent with the observed changes.

Explain your reasoning without notes. If a key idea is missing, revisit the lesson and try again.

Problem 1

A mean is 12.4°C and its baseline is 12.0°C. Find the anomaly.
Answer and explanation

0.4 °C

12.4 − 12.0 = 0.4.

Problem 2

A cold week disproves a multi-decade warming trend.
  1. True
  2. False
Answer and explanation

False

Short-term variability and long-term trends describe different scales.

Problem 3

Why state an emissions scenario with a projection?
Answer and explanation

The projected outcome depends partly on assumptions about future emissions.

Problem 4

An annual temperature is 14°C; baseline A is 12°C and B is 13°C. Find both anomalies. Explain the reasoning in your own words.
Answer and explanation

+2°C relative to A and +1°C relative to B; the actual temperature is unchanged.

Subtract each reference from the measurement.

14−12=+2°C; 14−13=+1°C.

Response criteria

  • Use the stated conditions.
  • Show the evidence or calculation.
  • Explain the conclusion and any stated limitation.

Problem 5

A dataset reports 0.3°C per decade. What does that unit mean? Show the reasoning, not just the conclusion.
Hints

Distinguish endpoint change from a fitted trend and attribution.

Answer and explanation

Average change of 0.3°C per 10 years under the stated trend estimate, not exactly that change every year.

Problem 6

Why compare observations with models that include and exclude different drivers?
Hints

State what the supplied observations or conditions establish, and separate that from any assumption.

Answer and explanation

The comparison helps test whether proposed drivers reproduce the pattern, rather than inferring cause from a trend alone.

Problem 7

Read an actual global temperature-analysis recordRead an actual global temperature-analysis recordGlobal annual anomaly (°C; 1951–1980 baseline)-0.200.40.81.21970198019902000201020202025YearNASA GISS/GISTEMP v4 • complete selected annual entries 1970–2024
Original plot of actual NASA GISTEMP v4 annual global Land–Ocean estimates, all 55 selected years from 1970–2024. Anomalies in °C relative to 1951–1980; record accessed 2026-10-13. Citation: GISTEMP Team (2026) and Lenssen et al. (2024). Later years are outside this selected interval, and the graph alone does not establish causal attribution. NASA GISS/GISTEMP v4 — source and analysis · Lenssen et al. (2024) — observational uncertainty
Interpret the supplied visual model. What does the 2024 value 1.28 °C mean, and does this graph say every place was exactly 1.28 °C warmer?
Answer and explanation

It is the estimated global annual Land–Ocean anomaly of +1.28 °C relative to the 1951–1980 baseline in this accessed record. Regional and daily changes vary; it is not the same increase everywhere.

Read the actual annual points and their stated baseline. The plot’s upper values are anomalies, not Earth’s absolute surface temperature.

It is the estimated global annual Land–Ocean anomaly of +1.28 °C relative to the 1951–1980 baseline in this accessed record. Regional and daily changes vary; it is not the same increase everywhere.

Response criteria

  • Read the labeled quantities, reference frame or objects correctly.
  • Explain the relation between the visual evidence and the mechanism.
  • Keep the drawing’s stated assumptions and limits in the conclusion.

Problem 8

An observed annual temperature is 16.4 °C and its matched baseline is 15.8 °C. Find the anomaly. A separate future scenario curve gives +1.2 °C at year 20. Explain what must be supplied before comparing the values.
Answer and explanation

The observed anomaly is +0.6 °C. The projection must specify the same variable, region, baseline and averaging interval, plus its scenario/assumptions. An observation and a conditional future model remain different kinds of evidence.

Subtract 16.4−15.8 = +0.6 °C.

Check matching baseline, coverage and time definition.

Identify projection assumptions and distinguish modeled future values from observations.

Response criteria

  • Use the stated measurements or conditions, with correct units.
  • Connect the result to the physical mechanism or evidence relationship.
  • Identify the assumption, model limit or further evidence requested.

Problem 9

Read an actual global temperature-analysis recordRead an actual global temperature-analysis recordGlobal annual anomaly (°C; 1951–1980 baseline)-0.200.40.81.21970198019902000201020202025YearNASA GISS/GISTEMP v4 • complete selected annual entries 1970–2024
Original plot of actual NASA GISTEMP v4 annual global Land–Ocean estimates, all 55 selected years from 1970–2024. Anomalies in °C relative to 1951–1980; record accessed 2026-10-13. Citation: GISTEMP Team (2026) and Lenssen et al. (2024). Later years are outside this selected interval, and the graph alone does not establish causal attribution. NASA GISS/GISTEMP v4 — source and analysis · Lenssen et al. (2024) — observational uncertainty
The complete selected NASA annual record has anomalies +0.03 °C in 1970 and +1.28 °C in 2024, on the same 1951–1980 reference. Find the endpoint change. Explain why this two-value subtraction is neither a fitted trend rate nor proof that every year and place warmed by that amount. Use the complete selected table to find a pair of consecutive years with a decrease.
Answer and explanation

The endpoint change is 1.28−0.03 = +1.25 °C in the global annual Land–Ocean anomaly. The common reference cancels. A fitted rate needs a specified method across the record and time units; this subtraction is an endpoint change. One adjacent decrease is 1970 (+0.03 °C) to 1971 (-0.08 °C), a change of -0.11 °C. Local/daily changes differ from the global annual estimate, and the graph alone is not a complete causal attribution.

Use the same variable, reference and annual definition for both values.

Subtract 1.28−0.03 = +1.25 °C; describe it as an endpoint change across the selected interval.

Inspect adjacent entries in the complete table to show annual variation.

Distinguish a global annual statistical estimate from local conditions, a fitted rate and a causal analysis.

Response criteria

  • Calculate +1.25 °C with the correct endpoint and baseline interpretation.
  • Give a valid adjacent-year decrease from the supplied table.
  • Distinguish endpoint change, fitted rate, local variation and causal attribution.

Browse all courses