Spectra & Evidence for an Expanding Universe — Practice · Grade 9 Science
Chapter: Stars & the UniverseWhat this practice covers
By the end of Spectra & Evidence for an Expanding Universe you should be able to:
- I can compare spectral-line patterns to infer composition and wavelength shift.
- I can connect independent observations to the model of an expanding universe.
8 questions, numeric, multiple choice and written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: spectrum, redshift, cosmic microwave background, light-year, megaparsec (Mpc).
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
0.1
(440 − 400) ÷ 400 = 0.10.
Problem 2
- redshifted
- blueshifted
- proof of a new element by itself
- unmeasurable
Answer and explanation
redshifted
Redshift refers to increased wavelength.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
A pattern makes identification more reliable and helps distinguish composition from shifts or measurement errors.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
Redshift z=0.02; interpretation needs the full pattern and relevant model.
Wavelength difference=510−500=10 nm.
z=10/500=0.02; the wavelength units cancel.
Response criteria
- Use the stated conditions.
- Show the evidence or calculation.
- Explain the conclusion and any stated limitation.
Problem 5
Hints
Not every redshift alone determines a unique distance or cause.
Answer and explanation
(510−500)/500=0.02.
Problem 6
Hints
State what the supplied observations or conditions establish, and separate that from any assumption.
Answer and explanation
A systematic relationship across many galaxies tests a global model rather than one object's local motion.
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
2100 km/s. Local gravitational motion and measurement/calibration differences can cause deviations from the broad relation; a nearby exception does not automatically refute the expansion model.
Read distance and speed as different axes. The straight line is an illustrative nearby approximation, not a route traveled by one galaxy over time.
2100 km/s. Local gravitational motion and measurement/calibration differences can cause deviations from the broad relation; a nearby exception does not automatically refute the expansion model.
Response criteria
- Read the labeled quantities, reference frame or objects correctly.
- Explain the relation between the visual evidence and the mechanism.
- Keep the drawing’s stated assumptions and limits in the conclusion.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
Both give z = 0.15: 75/500 and 90/600. Agreement supports a common fractional shift of that identified pattern, while the physical cause, distance and full cosmological interpretation need context, calibration and additional evidence.
Compute (575−500)/500 = 0.15.
Compute (690−600)/600 = 0.15.
Interpret the common fractional shift without assigning a unique cause from arithmetic alone.
Response criteria
- Use the stated measurements or conditions, with correct units.
- Connect the result to the physical mechanism or evidence relationship.
- Identify the assumption, model limit or further evidence requested.