Growth, Development, Resources & Long-Term Choices — Practice · Grade 12 Social Studies
Chapter: Global Connections, Risk & Economic InquiryWhat this practice covers
By the end of Growth, Development, Resources & Long-Term Choices you should be able to:
- I can separate output growth from per-person change.
- I can explain a civic or economic mechanism using evidence, assumptions, and a qualified conclusion.
8 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: growth, development, intensity, sustainability, resource stock.
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
Population can rise proportionately. In the supplied case, 100/50 and 120/60 both equal two. The larger total does not establish higher average output per person or universal improved conditions.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
Operation requires complementary resources, maintenance, institutions, and access. Spending records show inputs or acquisition, while service and outcome records show what changed. Explain the channel and actual use.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
Output can grow enough to outweigh the efficiency change. The supplied intensity falls ten percent while total use rises eight percent. State both measures and examine the mechanism rather than transferring the ratio’s direction to the total.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
State current and future costs, timing, distribution, uncertainty, relevant constraints, and alternatives. Define how the forecast would be tested. A predicted gain does not establish universal access or eliminate future risks.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
Intensity falls from ten to nine energy units per output, a ten percent decline. Total energy use rises eight percent. Thus the quoted claim is false for this packet: efficiency per unit improves while total use increases. The arithmetic does not establish the cause or full environmental effect; resource type, technology, and other evidence would add context.
Divide energy by output.
Calculate changes relative to original measures.
Separate ratios from totals.
Response criteria
- Explain the relevant institution or economic concept accurately; show correct calculations where needed.
- Connect supplied evidence and stated assumptions to an explained conclusion.
- Compare feasible options and their effects on different people without stereotypes.
- Identify a limitation, tradeoff, uncertainty, or condition that qualifies the conclusion.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
No. Production, distribution, capabilities, services, rights, environmental conditions, and unpaid activity require different measures. GDP can remain useful within its scope while other evidence is needed for a broader judgment.
Response criteria
- Explain the relevant institution or economic concept accurately; show correct calculations where needed.
- Connect supplied evidence and stated assumptions to an explained conclusion.
- Compare feasible options and their effects on different people without stereotypes.
- Identify a limitation, tradeoff, uncertainty, or condition that qualifies the conclusion.
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
Per-person output is two in both periods. Total output rises twenty percent while per-person growth is zero. Neither average identifies every resident’s income or broader development conditions.
Response criteria
- Explain the relevant institution or economic concept accurately; show correct calculations where needed.
- Connect supplied evidence and stated assumptions to an explained conclusion.
- Compare feasible options and their effects on different people without stereotypes.
- Identify a limitation, tradeoff, uncertainty, or condition that qualifies the conclusion.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
The stock ends at 95, a decline of five under the model. Actual ecosystems require evidence about renewal, timing, quality, and other changes. The simple balance is not a real environmental forecast.
Response criteria
- Explain the relevant institution or economic concept accurately; show correct calculations where needed.
- Connect supplied evidence and stated assumptions to an explained conclusion.
- Compare feasible options and their effects on different people without stereotypes.
- Identify a limitation, tradeoff, uncertainty, or condition that qualifies the conclusion.