Saving, Investing, Compounding & Risk — Practice · Grade 12 Social Studies
Chapter: Household Finance & Major DecisionsWhat this practice covers
By the end of Saving, Investing, Compounding & Risk you should be able to:
- I can identify the claim and instrument.
- I can explain a civic or economic mechanism using evidence, assumptions, and a qualified conclusion.
8 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: stock, bond, diversification, nominal return, time horizon.
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
They determine rights, access, and relevant risks. Ownership, debt, and deposits differ, and a resource may lose value or be unavailable when needed. A higher advertised return does not resolve those conditions.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
The second year earns five percent on $1,050 rather than only the original $1,000. That adds $52.50 instead of $50. The $2.50 difference follows the constant-rate, no-cost model, not a promised market outcome.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
A fixed dollar fee and a percentage charged on different balances can produce different outcomes. Define the balance, date, and excluded effects before calculating net return. Otherwise the comparison can overstate the amount retained.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
The holdings may share an industry, borrower, region, or common risk. Different names do not guarantee independent exposures. Diversification can reduce certain risks while leaving broad market and other losses possible.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
The balance is $1,102.50, including $102.50 modeled growth. Simple interest under the comparison gives $1,100. The $2.50 difference comes from growth on prior growth. The model assumes a constant positive rate and excludes actual risk, costs, tax, and inflation; it is not a promised return or an instruction to choose an investment.
Apply 1.05 twice.
Compare with $1,100 simple-interest total.
State excluded risks and costs.
Response criteria
- Explain the relevant institution or economic concept accurately; show correct calculations where needed.
- Connect supplied evidence and stated assumptions to an explained conclusion.
- Compare feasible options and their effects on different people without stereotypes.
- Identify a limitation, tradeoff, uncertainty, or condition that qualifies the conclusion.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
No. It can reduce some concentration risks, while common market changes, liquidity, credit, inflation, or fees can still matter. Explain exposures and conditions rather than treating the number of holdings as a guarantee.
Response criteria
- Explain the relevant institution or economic concept accurately; show correct calculations where needed.
- Connect supplied evidence and stated assumptions to an explained conclusion.
- Compare feasible options and their effects on different people without stereotypes.
- Identify a limitation, tradeoff, uncertainty, or condition that qualifies the conclusion.
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
The balance is $220.50 from $200×1.05×1.05. It follows a constant-rate model, not a guaranteed investment result. Actual losses, fees, tax, inflation, timing, and liquidity are excluded.
Response criteria
- Explain the relevant institution or economic concept accurately; show correct calculations where needed.
- Connect supplied evidence and stated assumptions to an explained conclusion.
- Compare feasible options and their effects on different people without stereotypes.
- Identify a limitation, tradeoff, uncertainty, or condition that qualifies the conclusion.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
The ending value is $520 and net gain $20, or four percent of the initial $500 under these dollar-cost assumptions. Inflation and tax are excluded; differently timed or based fees would require another calculation.
Response criteria
- Explain the relevant institution or economic concept accurately; show correct calculations where needed.
- Connect supplied evidence and stated assumptions to an explained conclusion.
- Compare feasible options and their effects on different people without stereotypes.
- Identify a limitation, tradeoff, uncertainty, or condition that qualifies the conclusion.