Qin, Han & Early Imperial Administration — Drills · Grade 6 Social Studies
Chapter: Classical Civilizations & Belief SystemsWhat these drills covers
By the end of Qin, Han & Early Imperial Administration you should be able to:
- I can explain qin, han & early imperial administration with accurate places, periods and defined terms.
- I can distinguish a supported observation from an inference in the supplied evidence case.
- I can justify a comparison or conclusion and explain a meaningful limit.
4 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: Qin, Han, standardization, administration, taxation.
Problem 1
Did Han rule simply reproduce every Qin practice unchanged?
Answer and explanation
No. Some institutions continued while others changed.
No. Some institutions continued while others changed.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 2
Can a policy have practical benefits and severe costs?
Answer and explanation
Yes. Effects can differ by group and process.
Yes. Effects can differ by group and process.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 3
Why compare actual arguments rather than only labels?
Answer and explanation
Labels can hide disagreement, overlap and change.
Labels can hide disagreement, overlap and change.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 4
Must all trade be organized directly by an emperor?
Answer and explanation
No. Many intermediaries and local networks also mattered.
No. Many intermediaries and local networks also mattered.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.