The Five Themes of Geography & Reading Maps — Practice · Grade 6 Social Studies
Chapter: Geography & the Tools of HistoryWhat this practice covers
By the end of The Five Themes of Geography & Reading Maps you should be able to:
- I can explain the five themes of geography & reading maps with accurate places, periods and defined terms.
- I can distinguish a supported observation from an inference in the supplied evidence case.
- I can justify a comparison or conclusion and explain a meaningful limit.
10 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: geography, Five Themes of Geography, latitude and longitude, map key (legend).
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
No. The map’s categories differ; compare an appropriate climate layer.
No. The map’s categories differ; compare an appropriate climate layer.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
A location north of the equator and east of the prime meridian, not a distance in kilometers.
A location north of the equator and east of the prime meridian, not a distance in kilometers.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
120 km along the measured represented path, within the map’s scale limits.
120 km along the measured represented path, within the map’s scale limits.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
No. Its generalization omits local detail; a suitable local map is needed.
No. Its generalization omits local detail; a suitable local map is needed.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
Endpoint separation=140 km east from B to A; marked route=160 km. Travel time needs mode, conditions and actual route information; the flat map has scale/projection limits.
Endpoint separation=140 km east from B to A; marked route=160 km. Travel time needs mode, conditions and actual route information; the flat map has scale/projection limits.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
Endpoint separation=140 km east from B to A; marked route=160 km. Travel time needs mode, conditions and actual route information; the flat map has scale/projection limits. The label must identify its evidence and avoid turning a model into an authentic artifact.
Endpoint separation=140 km east from B to A; marked route=160 km. Travel time needs mode, conditions and actual route information; the flat map has scale/projection limits. The label must identify its evidence and avoid turning a model into an authentic artifact.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
Endpoint separation=140 km east from B to A; marked route=160 km. Travel time needs mode, conditions and actual route information; the flat map has scale/projection limits. Limit the conclusion to the named evidence; compare a different dated setting using the same categories before widening it.
Endpoint separation=140 km east from B to A; marked route=160 km. Travel time needs mode, conditions and actual route information; the flat map has scale/projection limits. Limit the conclusion to the named evidence; compare a different dated setting using the same categories before widening it.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
A location north of the equator and east of the prime meridian, not a distance in kilometers. A useful new source addresses the missing information directly. Explain its provenance, access or scale; do not assume a second source answers every question.
A location north of the equator and east of the prime meridian, not a distance in kilometers. A useful new source addresses the missing information directly. Explain its provenance, access or scale; do not assume a second source answers every question.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 9
Answer and explanation
Use two specifically located details from the chapter reader and distinguish period, source purpose and scale. No. Its generalization omits local detail; a suitable local map is needed.
Use two specifically located details from the chapter reader and distinguish period, source purpose and scale. No. Its generalization omits local detail; a suitable local map is needed.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.
Problem 10
Answer and explanation
Endpoint separation=140 km east from B to A; marked route=160 km. Travel time needs mode, conditions and actual route information; the flat map has scale/projection limits. The revision note must quote or reproduce the changed claim and explain its improved accuracy.
Endpoint separation=140 km east from B to A; marked route=160 km. Travel time needs mode, conditions and actual route information; the flat map has scale/projection limits. The revision note must quote or reproduce the changed claim and explain its improved accuracy.
Response criteria
- Answer the actual question with accurate details.
- Explain how the evidence or language choice supports the conclusion.
- State a relevant limit, alternative or justified revision.