Reading Maps, Timelines & Historical Change — Practice · Grade 7 Social Studies
Chapter: Historical Inquiry & Indigenous NationsWhat this practice covers
By the end of Reading Maps, Timelines & Historical Change you should be able to:
- I can explain why the Haudenosaunee Confederacy has no single agreed founding date.
- I can say what kind of evidence a date rests on, and how sure that makes it.
- I can describe how the Mitchell Map shaped a border it drew inaccurately.
8 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: context, primary source, interpretation, scale, continuity.
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
The route network and boundaries may differ. Use a dated map or evidence of the roads, paths, waterways, and political conditions relevant to the journey.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
No. Absence from a particular map is not proof of absence from the landscape. The map’s creator, detail, and purpose limit what can be inferred.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
No. Subtracting dates gives elapsed time only. A causal explanation needs evidence about mechanisms and competing influences.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
Different measures answer different questions. Total residents and eligible voters cannot be directly treated as the same count; specify categories and relevant exclusions.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
The stipulated route is 6×20=120 km. A winding route can be longer than 90 km of straight-line separation. This assumes the path measurement and scale are correct; neither value alone establishes travel time or historical access.
Multiply the supplied path measurement by its scale.
Keep the result in kilometers.
Distinguish route length from straight-line separation.
Response criteria
- Describe the historical context and institutions accurately.
- Connect relevant evidence with an explained claim or calculation.
- Represent particular perspectives without stereotypes or invented testimony.
- Identify an assumption, evidentiary limit, or distinction that qualifies the conclusion.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
No. The intervals are 11 years and 74 years. Equal spacing can be an ordering aid if labeled; it is not a proportional time scale.
Response criteria
- Describe the historical context and institutions accurately.
- Connect relevant evidence with an explained claim or calculation.
- Represent particular perspectives without stereotypes or invented testimony.
- Identify an assumption, evidentiary limit, or distinction that qualifies the conclusion.
Problem 7
Answer and explanation
The nineteenth century, covering 1801–1900 under the standard CE century convention.
Problem 8
Answer and explanation
Check that the scale applies to the image and that the measured distance follows the intended route or straight-line definition.