Cities, Public Health & Everyday Life — Practice · Grade 8 Social Studies
Chapter: Industry, Migration & Urban LifeWhat this practice covers
By the end of Cities, Public Health & Everyday Life you should be able to:
- I can connect growth to infrastructure.
- I can explain a historical claim using relevant evidence and acknowledge its limits.
6 questions, written answer, each with a worked explanation.
Vocabulary used: context, corroboration, interpretation, infrastructure, rate.
Problem 1
Answer and explanation
It omits sanitation, water quality, building conditions, and health knowledge. Similar densities can have different outcomes when services differ.
Problem 2
Answer and explanation
The image shows selected visible conditions; residents can explain experiences, institutions, and concerns beyond its frame. Compare rather than assume either source is complete.
Problem 3
Answer and explanation
Safety, access, affordability, reliability, and costs. Explain which households benefit or remain excluded and what evidence measures each outcome.
Problem 4
Answer and explanation
Totals depend on population size. Rates account for that difference, though reporting, age, and other conditions still need consideration.
Problem 5
Answer and explanation
A has the lower recorded rate, but the two-neighborhood comparison does not isolate water quality. Inspection evidence supports a plausible mechanism; additional comparisons and context are needed to estimate its contribution.
A: 20 per 1,000; B: 30 per 1,000.
The smaller raw total in B conceals its higher rate.
Compare reporting, household conditions, and timing before making a causal claim.
Response criteria
- Describe the historical context and institutions accurately.
- Use relevant evidence and explain how it supports the claim.
- Represent perspectives without stereotypes or invented testimony.
- Identify a limitation, counterevidence, or information still needed.
Problem 6
Answer and explanation
A new building increases available places; a fee can still prevent attendance. Evaluate costs, enrollment, and the experience of excluded families.
Response criteria
- Describe the historical context and institutions accurately.
- Use relevant evidence and explain how it supports the claim.
- Represent perspectives without stereotypes or invented testimony.
- Identify a limitation, counterevidence, or information still needed.