Integrating Evidence & Citation — Practice · Grade 10 English

Chapter: Research & Source-Based Writing

What this practice covers

By the end of Integrating Evidence & Citation you should be able to:

11 questions, multiple choice and written answer, each with a worked explanation.

Vocabulary used: direct quotation, paraphrase, summary, signal phrase, in-text citation, plagiarism.

Problem 1

Which is a correctly formatted MLA in-text citation for an idea found on page 47 of a book by author Idris Bello?
  1. (Bello, page 47)
  2. (Idris 47)
  3. (Bello 47)
  4. [Bello: 47]
Answer and explanation

(Bello 47)

MLA in-text citations use the author's last name followed directly by the page number, with no comma, no 'page' label, and no brackets: (Bello 47).

Problem 2

When should a writer use a direct quotation instead of a paraphrase? Give one situation where quoting is the better choice.
Answer and explanation

A direct quotation is best when the source's exact wording carries weight that a paraphrase would lose — for example, a strikingly memorable phrase, a precise technical definition, or wording the writer wants to analyze closely. For most ordinary facts and ideas, paraphrasing or summarizing is better so the writing stays in the writer's own voice.

Problem 3

Which of these is a signal phrase?
  1. Furthermore,
  2. (Roy 12)
  3. In conclusion,
  4. According to marine biologist Dr. Nadia Roy,
Answer and explanation

According to marine biologist Dr. Nadia Roy,

A signal phrase introduces a source by naming who is speaking, like 'According to marine biologist Dr. Nadia Roy'; it isn't a transition word or the parenthetical citation itself.

Problem 4

A student copies a sentence from an article and changes only three or four words, adds no quotation marks, and includes no citation. Is this plagiarism? Explain.
Answer and explanation

Yes. Swapping a few words is not a genuine paraphrase — it keeps the source's sentence structure and phrasing, a practice sometimes called patchwriting — and without quotation marks or a citation, the reader would believe the phrasing and idea are the student's own. A real paraphrase rebuilds the idea in new words and structure and is still cited.

Problem 5

A student integrates a quotation perfectly with a signal phrase and cites it as (Okafor 30), but the paper's Works Cited page has no entry for Okafor. What is the problem?
  1. There is no problem; a signal phrase makes the Works Cited entry unnecessary.
  2. The in-text citation is incomplete without a matching Works Cited entry, since a reader needs both to identify and find the source.
  3. The page number should have been left out of the citation.
  4. The quotation should have been paraphrased instead.
Answer and explanation

The in-text citation is incomplete without a matching Works Cited entry, since a reader needs both to identify and find the source.

In-text citations are short pointers that only work alongside a full Works Cited entry; without it, a reader can't trace (Okafor 30) to an actual, findable source.

Problem 6

Explain why this is not yet a sound paraphrase. Give a detail and explain its relevance.
Answer and explanation

The wording remains nearly identical. Quote the phrase accurately, or recast the idea genuinely: Lee argues that labels should indicate where the evidence remains incomplete. Attribution is still needed.

Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.

Response criteria

  • Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
  • Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
  • Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.

Problem 7

A learner writes: “Changing three words means I no longer need a citation.” Explain the problem and produce a better response.
Answer and explanation

Borrowed ideas still need attribution, and borrowed distinctive wording needs quotation marks. Rewriting is not a numerical word-substitution rule.

Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.

Response criteria

  • Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
  • Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
  • Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.

Problem 8

Compare what you must inspect in these two cases. What can transfer, and what must be checked again?
Answer and explanation

A citation allows readers to trace borrowed words and ideas. MLA in-text references direct readers to a Works Cited entry, adding an available locator such as a page number when appropriate. The method transfers, but the particular detail, scope, and context must be read again. The wording remains nearly identical. Quote the phrase accurately, or recast the idea genuinely: Lee argues that labels should indicate where the evidence remains incomplete. Attribution is still needed.

Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.

Response criteria

  • Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
  • Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
  • Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.

Problem 9

Using an assigned reading or one exercise source, write a developed response applying integrating evidence & citation. Aim for 220–320 words; name the reading or reproduce the sentence you revise.
Answer and explanation

If Lee is not named in the sentence, use (Lee); if the prose already names Lee, do not repeat it without a locator. The entry uses Lee, the article title, the site title, date, and URL. Do not add a made-up page. A complete response supplies context, a focused claim, a brief supporting detail, explanation, and a relevant qualification. Do not simply repeat this model.

Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.

Response criteria

  • Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
  • Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
  • Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.

Problem 10

Write two specific feedback comments on a response to this unit: one on accuracy or meaning and one on evidence or language. Then state a revision priority.
Answer and explanation

Check whether the response explains a citation allows readers to trace borrowed words and ideas. mla in-text references direct readers to a works cited entry, adding an available locator such as a page number when appropriate. Ask for a relevant detail and the reason it supports the conclusion. Prioritize the mistaken assumption shown here: “Changing three words means I no longer need a citation.”

Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.

Response criteria

  • Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
  • Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
  • Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.

Problem 11

Choose a fresh sentence or detail from the assigned selection. Explain how this unit’s method applies, and identify one uncertainty or limitation.
Answer and explanation

The report documents litter removal, the resident distinguishes water contamination, and the memo separates funding purposes. The event can be successful within its stated scope while water quality remains unresolved. The response must supply its own precise detail and explain it; copying the model without fresh evidence is insufficient.

Use the criteria to compare your reasoning, not to copy the model’s wording. A supported alternative interpretation may earn full credit.

Response criteria

  • Make an accurate, focused claim or revision.
  • Use a relevant detail or a clearly explained language choice.
  • Explain the relationship and recognize a relevant limit.

Browse all courses